Insulin is there to grow fat tissue for the obesity epidemic, not replenish glycogen after yoga.
Teaser: insulin-induce hypoglycemia can get deadly quite fast, and there is no equivalent for the effects of insulin on fat. However, the effects of insulin on fat are 100 times more powerful.
Background: Hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) responds to insulin by inhibiting lipolysis. It halts fat burning. It got its name because it’s THEE most hormone-sensitive lipase in the body. The hormone about which we are speaking is of course insulin. And the enzyme, or at least one of the enzymes as it were, is HSL. To be clear, it takes very little insulin to inhibit HSL. Just a dollop, in fact.
Effect of very small concentrations of insulin on forearm metabolism. Persistence of its action on potassium and free fatty acids without its effect on glucose. (Zierler and Rabinowitz, 1964)
Expt 1. Since we’re all about jabbing people with insulin lately, let’s get at it again. Jab someone with about 100 uU (/min*kg), and muscle and fat vacuum glucose out of the blood. Same goes for potassium; and adipose gets all stingy too… it stops releasing and starts storing fat. This is “healthy,” and its part of why people say insulin, and by extension carbohydrate, causes lean people grow fat tissue.
What do you think would happen in an insulin resistant obese crowd. Less glucose vacuuming, but scrooge adipose will still responds with gravitas, by saving more and spending less? Likely. HSL is like the little piggy’s straw house. The strong young wolf can blow it down. The COPD emphysema wolf can blow it down… because it’s made of straw.
Thus, insulin causes lean people to grow fat tissue, and it causes obese people to grow more fat tissue.
In other words, with regard to common obesity, being resistant to insulin means postprandial hyperglycemia; you can’t handle sugars proper. but it’ll still make you fat(ter).
Expt 2. The interesting part. Try jabbing healthy people with 10x less insulin. Looks like IR obesity! Adipose gets stingy, potassium scrams, but no effect on glucose uptake.
In the figure below: A-DV is muscle; A-SV is adipose. Glucose uptake into fat & muscle is unaffected by a low dose of insulin.
Second figure: with the same dose, adipose goes on a budget SAVE MORE SPEND LESS
Conclusion. In a healthy person, (eg, 
), even very low doses of insulin cause fat growth. This isn’t an issue of high vs. low glycemic issue. The insulin dose used in this study was less than that expected from a respectable low glycemic index meal. This is probably why the glycemic index hasn’t cured the obesity epidemic. On the other hand, dietary fat doesn’t stimulate insulin… just sayin’
Furthermore, perhaps glucose uptake into adipose promotes fat storage under certain conditions, but it’s clearly neither necessary nor essential. Insulin can Miracle Grow fat mass without affecting glucose uptake one iota. I imagine the abundance of 3C precursors simply isn’t “the limiting factor.” And it works just as good with Whole Foods Low GI pa$ta and Wonderbread.
Translation: insulin buttresses fat growth. and it doesn’t matter how much. FYI this probably seems nonsensical at first: carbs stimulate insulin in order to dispose of said carbs, like a logical feedback mechanism. Perhaps. But said insulin cares far more about fat than said carbs. On a scale of 1 to 10 (ie, putting things into “perspective”): insulin is there to grow fat tissue for the obesity epidemic, not replenish glycogen after yoga.
Part II.
Dose-dependent effect of insulin on plasma free fatty acid turnover and oxidation in humans (Bonadonna et al., 1990)
There are a lot of data in this paper, but here are the relevant points:
Infuse insulin at various rates. In the lowest infusion rate, the only aspect of glucose metabolism to respond is hepatic glucose production (second line; HGP declines from 2.0 to 1.34 at the lowest dose):
WRT low dose insulin on glucose metabolism: liver responds, not skeletal muscle. Skeletal muscle doesn’t even look at glucose until insulin infusion reaches 250 – 500 uU, which is probably why back in ’64 they saw absolutely no effect at 10 uU. At 100 uU they saw an effect, but according to these data, it was likely due solely to liver, because skeletal muscle doesn’t seem to care until levels exceed 250 uU (it’s an infusion rate, not an absolute concentration. But that’s neither here nor there). To be clear, 10 uU insulin infusion doesn’t affect glucose metabolism (1964). period. 100 uU modestly affects it (1964), and this is probably so modest because only liver is helping out (1990). At 500 uU, full scale attack on blood glucose.
But fatty acids are obliterated with 5 – 50 x less:
It worked with 10 uU in ’64, and it worked just as well with 100 uU in ’90. (FYI the first paper was published in 1964; this one in 1990).
Furthermore, in the table above glucose metabolism was progressively affected with increasing insulin concentrations. Not so much with FAs:
FA flux is rapidly and completely shut down with a dollop of insulin. Indeed, it is obliterated. Giving more insulin doesn’t do anything, because, well, when you blow down a straw house, it tends to stay down.
calories proper
Become a Patron!
Save
and 
. Then, it was the 
eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids (EPA and DHA, respectively). Then, palmitoleic acid. Corn and soybean oil, on the other hand, are being appropriately recognized as bad. The utter hatred and fear of saturated fats is starting to wane, and we might even see a transition back to 
before I die (circa 2113). But today’s post is on another topic: trans fats, oxidized fish oils, and dairy fat.
CS (+ some other chemicals). But those kids didn’t do that. they ate less of other foods.
that warrants attention. (it could be the increasing fat intake, but for now let’s just say it’s RYGB per se). According to this pearl, weight loss of only 10% via diet alone causes energy expenditure crash by 394-500 kcal/d, and physiological replacement of leptin via subcutaneous injection can increase this by 234-454 kcal/d (
, and the associated hyperinsulinemia are the bane of anyone with obesity or any sort of hyperplastic fat tissue disorder. And yes, this is the worst type of evidence to support such a stance, but when you’ve got lemons, well…
. But for those who simply choose to selectively reduce their insulin dosage, they: 1) don’t die; 2) lose fat; and 3) get hyperglycemic and incur all the damage that ensues (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy). Furthermore, they’re walking on thin ice – DKA is lurking. It is just as stupid yet more dangerous than using tapeworms to lose weight.
