A non-zealot keto study!

These researchers were too interested in their sophisticated instruments for assessing body composition than to care about keto per se. Lol (Buechert et al., 2019)

[Patron link]

Small study (n=12), duration was 6 weeks.

Keto diet was good and well-adhered to. Urinary ketones positive on 97% of the days. The “rules” were also good, simple: no processed foods, be aware of hidden carbs in stuff like gum, lunch meat, etc. Fruits and vege were fine as long as they were within the carb limits and we know that they were, because positive urinary ketones. They were allowed nuts and dark chocolate, too.

It wasn’t supposed to be a weight loss study, but they all lost weight.

Weakness: no control group – only before/after comparisons.

For the rest of this blog post, head over to Patreon! Five bucks a month for access to this and all previous articles. It’s ad-free and you can cancel if it sucks 

These pork rinds are the bomb. Seriously! And if you like spicy

For personalized health consulting services: drlagakos@gmail.com.

Affiliate links: Still looking for a pair of hot blue blockers? TrueDark is offering 10% off HERE and Spectra479 is offering 15% off HERE. Use discount code LAGAKOS for a deal on CarbonShades. If you have no idea what I’m talking about, read this then this.

calories proper

Share